May 15 Training Institute Early Registration Deadline
May 16 Webinar The "Good Enough" Investigation
June 15 Annual Conference Sponsorships Due
June 25-29 Training Institute San Diego
July 11 Webinar When Investigations Turn Criminal
August 15 Webinar Disability Discrimination Investigations
September 13 Webinar Workplace Violence Investigations
Featured Sustaining Member
Marilou F. Mirkovich is a partner in the Cerritos office of Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Rudd & Romo. She represents employers in all aspects of labor relations and employment law. Ms. Mirkovich focused on defending discrimination claims in federal and state courts and handles matters pending before the EEOC, DFEH, and FEHC. In addition to her employment practice, Ms. Mirkovich serves as the firm's lead investigator on numerous public and private sector matters. She served as President of the Board of Directors for the Community Family Guidance Center. She has been an active participant in the HIV and AIDS Legal Services Alliance (HALSA). Ms. Mirkovich has also been on the Board of Directors for the Friends of the Cerritos Center for the Performing Arts.
Attorneys Conducting Workplace Investigations: Navigating the Perils of PrivilegeRegister by February 14, 2012 to View Live February 14, 2012 1-2:30 pm and/or Recorded Through December 31, 2012Co-Sponsored by the State Bar of California Labor & Employment Law Section. 1.5 Hours MCLE Credit Approved. HRCI Credit Pending.Presented by Lindsay Harris and Mark TuftPrivilege issues loom large in internal investigations, yet all too often investigators and company counsel misunderstand this complex area of law. Through a series of dynamic hypotheticals, this Webinar will examine the key privilege issues affecting workplace investigations, with reference to the California Rules of Professional Conduct, the ABA Model Rules, federal and state rules of evidence, and leading court decisions. Co-sponsored by State Bar of California Labor & Employment Section. The Webinar will include a power point presentation covering the following topics: Elements of the attorney-client privilege under state and federal law Elements of the work product privilege under each Factors to consider in determining whether an investigation should be privileged and the role of the attorney-investigator in making the decision Are factual investigations subject to the attorney-client privilege?
Privilege implications of conducting and memorializing witness interviews and reporting the results of a workplace investigation (e.g., notes vs. witness statements vs. recordings) Privilege issue in interviewing officers and directors, supervisors and department heads, consultants and former employees Privilege issues following the investigation:
Privilege and ethical consideration where:
Specific ethics and other rules to be discussed include the following: California Business and Professions Code section 6068(e) and (m) California Evidence Code sections 250, 911-919, 950-958, 962 Federal Rules of Evidence 501, 502 California Rules of Professional Conduct 1-100, 2-100, 3-100, 3-110, 3-310, 3-400, 3-500, 3-600, 3-700, 5-210, 5-220 ABA Model Rules 1.2, 1.4, 1.6, 1.8(b), 1.8(f), 1.8(h), 1.9, 1.10, 1.13, 1.16, 2.3, 2.4, 3.7, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4 Lindsay Harris brings considerable employment law and investigative experience to her current practice focused on conducting independent investigations of suspected workplace misconduct. Clients frequently turn to Ms. Harris for independent investigations involving high-level, complex, and sensitive matters. Mark L. Tuft is a litigation partner with Cooper, White & Cooper LLP in San Francisco. He serves as outside counsel to lawyers and law firms on professional responsibility, professional liability, law firm mergers and dissolutions and State Bar disciplinary matters. He also acts as an expert witness and consultant in these matters. |